Is The5ers Losing Its Edge? The Story Behind Its Trustpilot Rating Drop From 4.9 to 4.7
A data-driven investigation into what changed at one of the most trusted prop firms in the industry, and what every funded trader needs to know before their next payout request.
The5ers Trustpilot rating decline is one of the most telling stories in the prop firm industry right now. For years, The5ers held a near-perfect 4.9 out of 5 on Trustpilot, making it the benchmark every other funded trading firm was measured against. By mid-2026 that number had quietly slipped to 4.7. On the surface the shift looks small. At a volume of 34,314 verified reviews it represents thousands of unhappy traders and a pattern of complaints that tells a far more serious story than the headline number suggests.
This is not a hit piece. The5ers has been operating since 2016 and has paid out over $43 million in verified profits to traders worldwide. That track record is real. But something shifted in 2025 and continued into 2026, and the complaints coming through Trustpilot, Reddit, and Forex Peace Army tell a consistent story that every prop trader deserves to understand before they commit real money to any funded programme.
What Used to Make The5ers the Gold Standard
Before getting into what changed, it is worth understanding why The5ers held that 4.9 rating in the first place. The firm genuinely earned it. Traders consistently reported fast real-time chat support, a clean intuitive dashboard, clearly written rules, and payouts processed within 24 hours. That combination of reliability and transparency is rare in an industry full of firms that collect challenge fees and then complicate the path to getting paid.
The5ers also stood out because third-party verification through Payout Junction independently tracked over $43 million in processed payments. That is not a marketing claim. It is a verified figure. For most of its history, The5ers was exactly what it said it was.
The 6 Things That Actually Changed in 2025 and 2026
The The5ers Trustpilot rating decline did not happen because the firm suddenly became dishonest. It happened because specific things changed in how it operates, and those changes concentrated pain in one particular group: the traders who were most profitable.
Payout timelines blew out
What used to be a 24-hour payout stretched into actual 1 to 2 week waits, with some cases stretching even longer. In March 2026, The5ers publicly acknowledged the delays on their official X account, admitting payments were taking longer than expected. Traders on Reddit documented the pattern in real time. The “approved but pending” status appeared repeatedly as a stall that support could not or would not explain. Source: PropFirmGeeks
The “bulk trading” rule became a catch-all denial tool
One of the most documented cases: a trader’s second payout was denied for bulk trading in May 2025. A senior review at The5ers concluded it was a misunderstanding, released the payout, and issued an apology. Then in December 2025, the fourth payout was denied for the exact same trading method that had already been reviewed and approved. When the trader asked for specific trade IDs or dates to understand what changed, The5ers declined to provide them and declared the decision final. Source: PropFirmGeeks
Platform migration created new breach triggers
After a dashboard migration, spread calculations changed in ways traders had not been warned about. The platform began counting spreads only on the negative side of hedged positions, creating drawdown breaches that previously would not have triggered. There were also reported cases of stop-losses firing on market holidays when gold was officially closed. The5ers responded with only a loss refund and declined to address the missed profit the technical failure caused. Source: PropFirmGeeks
KYC became a post-funding block
A consistent pattern emerged where KYC that cleared at account creation was re-reviewed at payout stage. One documented case: a trader completed all evaluation phases and traded successfully for months, but the account was closed over an alleged name mismatch that was never raised during the evaluation period and only surfaced once the profitable account was ready for a significant withdrawal. Source: PropFirmGeeks
The video interview clause is the most dangerous contractual trap
The5ers terms allow the firm to request a video interview at any point. Failure to schedule it within five business days results in denial of all pending payouts, immediate account cancellation, and termination of the collaboration. Independent reviewers noted these requests appeared most frequently on large, profitable accounts. What makes this dangerous is not the clause itself but the discretion over when it is triggered. Compliance and support were also documented giving contradictory signals, leaving traders uncertain which team’s answer was binding. Source: PropXO
Broad enforcement discretion is the core problem
What independent reviewers flagged in 2026 is not whether The5ers is fraudulent but how much discretionary power the firm holds at payout stage. The prohibited practices framework is unusually broad: bulk trading, one-sided bets, copy trading, HFT, tick scalping, and certain EA usage are all banned with severe consequences. The5ers is still not in the category of firms that never paid anyone. The issue is structural: small payouts process smoothly, but large, profitable accounts face increasing scrutiny under rules vague enough to apply selectively. That gap is where most 2025 and 2026 complaints are concentrated. Source: PropXO
The Financial Stress Theory: And Why It Actually Holds Up
Here is where the The5ers Trustpilot rating decline gets more interesting than a simple story about a firm going bad. The complaints are not random. They concentrate almost entirely at one specific point: the moment an account becomes highly profitable and a large payout is requested. Small accounts and first payouts still process cleanly for most traders. The friction appears at scale. That pattern points to something structural rather than deliberate fraud.
“The revenue generated today will impact your payouts months later. As long as the company grows, you don’t feel it. But when growth stabilises or drops, your payout obligations catch up, and suddenly, your margins vanish.”
Ruben Abitbol, Former Head of Trading and Risk, The5ers (Finance Magnates, November 2025)That quote comes from inside The5ers itself. Abitbol left the firm and launched a risk management consultancy specifically to help prop firms navigate the exact problem he is describing. His departure and public comments in late 2025 line up precisely with the period when complaints at The5ers began escalating in volume.
The underlying economics work like this. Challenge fee revenue comes in today. Payout obligations arrive two to three months later when funded traders hit their profit targets. As long as the firm is growing rapidly, new fee revenue covers old obligations and everything looks fine. The moment growth slows or plateaus, those obligations hit simultaneously and the cashflow gap becomes visible. This is exactly what The5ers’ former risk chief described, and it is exactly the timeline we see in the complaint data.
The Industry Context Makes This Clearer
The5ers is not alone in facing this pressure. Between February 2024 and late 2025, approximately 80 to 100 prop firms ceased operations worldwide. The firms that collapsed shared a common characteristic: challenge fee revenue from failing traders funded payouts to successful ones. The moment trader success rates improved or new signups slowed, the model broke.
The5ers has a far stronger foundation than most firms that collapsed. Ten years of operation, real institutional infrastructure, verified payouts through a third-party system, and known leadership all separate it from firms that simply vanished. However, the cashflow lag problem that Abitbol described does not spare firms with good intentions. It is a mathematical reality of the model itself.
What This Means if You Are Considering a Funded Account
This analysis is not an argument to avoid The5ers entirely. For many traders, particularly at the early stages of a funded account, the experience is still clean and the firm still pays. The lesson is more nuanced. The question to ask about any prop firm is not just whether they have paid traders before. It is whether their cashflow is healthy enough to pay you when your account becomes large enough to matter to them financially.
Still working well
- First and second payouts still process cleanly for most traders
- Platform is stable and rules are clearly written
- Chat support still responsive for standard queries
- 10-year track record and independently verified payout history
- Real institutional infrastructure and known leadership team
Where the friction is
- Large payout requests trigger compliance reviews
- Vague rules applied inconsistently on profitable accounts
- KYC re-reviews appearing after months of clean trading
- Video interview clause with five-day hard termination deadline
- No appeal path once a compliance decision is made
- Platform changes after migration created new breach risks
- Rules like “bulk trading” that have no clear definition and cannot be appealed with specific evidence
- A trading strategy approved on earlier payouts that is suddenly cited as a violation on a larger one
- KYC that passed at account creation being re-reviewed right before a significant withdrawal
- Video verification requests that appear specifically when a large payout is pending
- Payout status stuck at “approved but pending” for more than five business days with no communication
- Promotional terms disputed after purchase when affiliate sites advertised them differently
The Bigger Lesson for Prop Traders
The prop firm model has a structural tension built into it. The firm earns money when traders fail their challenges. The firm pays out when traders succeed. As long as both sides stay balanced, everything works. The moment too many traders succeed simultaneously or challenge fee revenue slows, the firm is under financial pressure regardless of how legitimate its intentions are.
Therefore, the real due diligence question before joining any funded programme is not just whether the firm has paid traders before. It is whether the firm’s current financial position can sustain paying you when you reach a size that actually matters. Past performance from a prop firm’s payout history does not guarantee future payouts when the economics shift. The5ers demonstrates that clearly.
Build a Strategy That Can Survive Any Prop Firm Review
GhostTraders teaches the Smart Money methodology used by institutional traders. Learn the approach before you risk funded capital.
Explore courses